4.7 Article

Multi-spectroscopic and molecular docking studies for binding interaction between fluvoxamine and human serum albumin

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2021.119495

关键词

Fluvoxamine; Human serum albumin; Fluorescence spectroscopy; Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy; Molecular modeling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the binding interaction between the antidepressant drug fluvoxamine and human serum albumin under simulated physiological conditions. The results showed that hydrophobic forces were the principal intermolecular forces stabilizing the complex, leading to a slight change in human serum albumin conformation.
In the present study, different spectroscopic techniques have been used to study the binding interaction between the antidepressant drug fluvoxamine and human serum albumin under simulated physiological conditions (pH 7.4). The utilized spectroscopic techniques include fluorescence emission spectroscopy, synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy, UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and molecular modeling methods. The obtained results revealed that the formation of a complex between human serum albumin and fluvoxamine was responsible for quenching the native fluorescence of human serum albumin. The results indicated that the quenching mechanism between human serum albumin and fluvoxamine was static. Besides, the binding constant (K), number of binding sites (n), thermodynamic parameters (Delta H, Delta S, and Delta G), and binding forces were calculated at three different temperatures (298, 310, and 318 K). These data proposed that hydrophobic forces were the principal intermolecular forces stabilizing the complex. From the molecular docking results, it could be deduced that fluvoxamine was inserted into sub-domain II A (site I) of human serum albumin and led to a slight change in human serum albumin conformation. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据