4.6 Article

A simple and effective detection strategy using double exponential scheme for photovoltaic systems monitoring

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY
卷 214, 期 -, 页码 337-354

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.10.086

关键词

Photovoltaic systems; Empirical models; Anomaly detection; Shading; Electrical faults; Statistical control charts

资金

  1. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Office of Sponsored Research (OSR) [OSR-2019-CRG7-3800]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An effective monitoring method for photovoltaic systems based on parametric models and double exponentially smoothing scheme is designed in this study, successfully detecting various faults through a combination of empirical models and smoothing strategies.
Effective and efficient monitoring of a photovoltaic plant are indispensable to maintain the generated power at the desired specifications. In this work, a simple and effective monitoring method based on parametric models and the double exponentially smoothing scheme is designed to monitor photovoltaic systems. This method merges the simplicity and flexibility of empirical models and the sensitivity of the double exponentially smoothing strategy to uncover small deviations. Essentially, the empirical models are adopted to obtain residuals to detect and identify occurred faults. Here, a double exponentially smoothing scheme is used to sense faults by examining the generated residuals. Moreover, to extend the flexibility of the double exponentially smoothing approach, a nonparametric detection threshold has been computed via kernel density estimation. Several different scenarios of faults were considered to assess the developed method, including PV string fault, inverter disconnection, circuit breaker faults, partial shading, PV modules short-circuited, and soiling on the PV array. It is showed using real data from a 9.54 kWp photovoltaic system that the considered faults were successfully traced using the developed approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据