4.6 Article

Self-adaptive differential evolution applied to combustion engine calibration

期刊

SOFT COMPUTING
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 109-135

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-020-05469-4

关键词

Optimization algorithm; Differential evolution algorithm; Hybrid approach; Unconstrained optimization

资金

  1. National Council of Scientific and Technologic Development of Brazil-CNPq [307958/2019-1-PQ, 307966/2019-4-PQ, 405101/2016-3-Univ, 404659/2016-0-Univ]
  2. PRONEX Fundacao Araucaria [042/2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new population-based stochastic optimization algorithm HSADE is proposed in this paper, addressing unconstrained global optimization problems by exploring and combining best features of DE algorithms. HSADE achieved optimal performance in benchmark functions testing and automotive sector applications, significantly improving calibration efficiency.
In this paper, a new population-based stochastic optimization algorithm called Hybrid Self-Adaptive Differential Evolution (HSADE) is proposed. The algorithm addresses unconstrained global optimization problems, exploring and combining the best features of some Differential Evolution (DE), obtaining a good balance between exploration and exploitation. These approaches are important for increasing the accuracy and efficiency of a population-based stochastic algorithm and for adapting the control parameter values during the optimization process. Further, they are crucial for increasing the convergence speed and reducing the risk of search stagnation. To verify the performance of the HSADE, 25 benchmark functions were tested presenting an optimal performance when compared to some state-of-the-art DEs algorithms. Furthermore, an experimental problem in an automotive sector, related to automatic internal combustion engine calibration, was used adjusting 300 decision variables. The HSADE achieved a reliable calibration, reducing the time required to perform approximately 90% when comparing to other optimization algorithms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据