4.6 Article

Competing anticlastic and piezoelectric deformation at large deflections

期刊

SMART MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-665X/abdcfd

关键词

piezoelectricity; anticlastic curvature; Searle parameter; actuator; beam; bender; large deflections

资金

  1. Research Council of Norway [273248]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the cross-sectional deformation of piezoelectric cantilever-actuators considering both anticlastic and electromechanical bending effects. The Searle parameter is found to play a key role in characterizing the shape of the cross-section. A load scaling rule provides a criterion for fixed cross-section deflection for different actuator widths, maintaining the Searle parameter unchanged.
In bending of a purely elastic beam or plate, it is well established that the cross-sectional shape changes character with decreasing bending radius-of-curvature and that the transition can be characterized by the Searle parameter. In a piezoelectric structure, the cross-sectional deformation is affected by the opposite anticlastic and electromechanical bending curvatures. The behavior is consequently more complicated and it is an open question how the cross-sectional shape develops with increasing bending. In this paper, analytical solutions are used to study the cross-sectional deformation of piezoelectric cantilever-actuators taking both anticlastic and electromechanical bending effects into account. We consider unimorph and bimorph actuators. In the case of electrical actuation, as for the purely mechanical case, we find that the Searle parameter is an important parameter characterizing the shape of the cross-section. A load scaling rule gives a criterion for fixed cross-section-deflection for different actuator widths. Using this scaling rule, the Searle parameter is kept unchanged. The analytical results are verified by non-linear finite element analysis using electric potential and mechanical moment as applied loads.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据