4.6 Review

The association of insomnia disorder characterised by objective short sleep duration with hypertension, diabetes and body mass index: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

SLEEP MEDICINE REVIEWS
卷 59, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101456

关键词

Insomnia disorder; Short sleep duration; Polysomnography; Actigraphy; Hypertension; Type 2 diabetes; Obesity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insomnia disorder with objective short sleep duration is associated with a higher risk of hypertension and type 2 diabetes compared to normal sleep duration, but not with body mass index. There was no significant difference in risk between insomnia disorder with objective short sleep and objective short sleep without insomnia disorder. More cohort study data is needed to further investigate these associations.
Insomnia disorder with objective short sleep duration (less than 6 h of objective sleep or sleep efficiency less than 85%) has been considered as a biologically severe subtype of insomnia associated with a higher risk of cardiometabolic disease morbidity. This systematic review and meta-analysis firstly compared insomnia disorder with objective short and normal sleep duration, and subsequently, objective short sleep duration with and without insomnia disorder, and their associations with hypertension, type 2 diabetes and body mass index. A systematic search of five databases yielded 2345 non-duplicated articles, of which 11 individual studies were used for the qualitative review and 10 individual studies for the meta-analysis. The sample size varied from 30 to 4994 participants. A higher risk of hypertension (RR 1.54, 95% CI: [1.30; 1.82] p < 0.0001) and type 2 diabetes (RR 1.63 [1.37; 1.94], p < 0.0001) was associated with insomnia disorder with objective short sleep compared to normal sleep duration, but not for body mass index. Comparisons between insomnia disorder with objective short sleep and objective short sleep without insomnia disorder showed no significant differences. However, the majority of these studies were cross-sectional, and there is a need for more cohort study data. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据