4.7 Article

Smart formaldehyde detection enabled by metal organic framework-derived doped electrospun hollow nanofibers

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 326, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128819

关键词

Gas sensor; Formaldehyde; Doping; Hollow nanofibers; Metal-organic framework

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51978569, 51803164]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M643635]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2019JQ126]
  4. Natural Science Research Project of Shaanxi Provincial Department of Education [19JK0293]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By incorporating Zn2+ doping and optimizing the structure design, the 15wt% ZZS HNFs were successfully synthesized to achieve sensitive monitoring of low concentration HCHO, exhibiting excellent gas sensing performance and fast response rate. The high sensitivity of HCHO in the smart detection device highlights the potential for future smart indoor air quality monitoring.
In this work, the metal-organic framework (MOF)-derived Zn2+ doped SnO2 (ZZS) hollow nanofibers (HNFs) have been successfully synthesized via facile electrospinning and annealing techniques for achieving the low concentration of HCHO monitoring. As the hollow nanostructure and the optimized Zn(2+ )homogeneous doping behavior ensure all the smooth electrons transfer, abundant chemisorbed active sites and oxygen vacancies, the 15 wt% ZZS HNFs exhibited the excellent gas-sensing property with a sensing response value of 25.7 towards 100 ppm HCHO, fast response/recovery time (12 /45 s) and the detection capacity of HCHO down to 500 ppb in a rapid response/recovery time (10/2 s) compared with pristine SnO2 and other ZZS HNFs. Moreover, when assembled into a practical smart detection device for real-time monitoring and early warning of HCHO, the 15 wt % ZZS HNFs still presented high sensitivity of HCHO, highlighting its bright commercial prospect in the future of smart indoor air quality monitoring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据