4.6 Article

Binary Amplitude Reflection Gratings for X-ray Shearing and Hartmann Wavefront Sensors

期刊

SENSORS
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21020536

关键词

X-ray; wavefront; shearing; Hartmann; Talbot; grating; interferometry; aberrations

资金

  1. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New binary-amplitude reflective gratings have been designed and modeled for shearing interferometry and Hartmann wavefront sensing in high-coherent-flux X-ray beamlines. These gratings, compact and capable of withstanding high power densities, can operate across a broad range of photon energies with fixed grating-to-detector distance. Coherent wave-propagation is utilized to study energy bandwidth and set design parameters, enabling effective performance over a wide bandwidth.
New, high-coherent-flux X-ray beamlines at synchrotron and free-electron laser light sources rely on wavefront sensors to achieve and maintain optimal alignment under dynamic operating conditions. This includes feedback to adaptive X-ray optics. We describe the design and modeling of a new class of binary-amplitude reflective gratings for shearing interferometry and Hartmann wavefront sensing. Compact arrays of deeply etched gratings illuminated at glancing incidence can withstand higher power densities than transmission membranes and can be designed to operate across a broad range of photon energies with a fixed grating-to-detector distance. Coherent wave-propagation is used to study the energy bandwidth of individual elements in an array and to set the design parameters. We observe that shearing operates well over a +/- 10% bandwidth, while Hartmann can be extended to +/- 30% or more, in our configuration. We apply this methodology to the design of a wavefront sensor for a soft X-ray beamline operating from 230 eV to 1400 eV and model shearing and Hartmann tests in the presence of varying wavefront aberration types and magnitudes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据