4.6 Article

Digital Health in Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention: A Search for the Ideal Tool

期刊

SENSORS
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21010012

关键词

digital health; mobile health; sensors; cardiovascular rehabilitation; secondary prevention; heart failure; artificial intelligence; telerehabilitation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Digital health is playing an increasingly important role in cardiology, providing services such as remote monitoring, rehabilitation, and prevention to optimize patient care and treatment. However, overcoming important barriers is still needed for the implementation of digital health technologies.
Digital health is becoming more integrated in daily medical practice. In cardiology, patient care is already moving from the hospital to the patients' homes, with large trials showing positive results in the field of telemonitoring via cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), monitoring of pulmonary artery pressure via implantable devices, telemonitoring via home-based non-invasive sensors, and screening for atrial fibrillation via smartphone and smartwatch technology. Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention are modalities that could greatly benefit from digital health integration, as current compliance and cardiac rehabilitation participation rates are low and optimisation is urgently required. This viewpoint offers a perspective on current use of digital health technologies in cardiac rehabilitation, heart failure and secondary prevention. Important barriers which need to be addressed for implementation in medical practice are discussed. To conclude, a future ideal digital tool and integrated healthcare system are envisioned. To overcome personal, technological, and legal barriers, technological development should happen in dialog with patients and caregivers. Aided by digital technology, a future could be realised in which we are able to offer high-quality, affordable, personalised healthcare in a patient-centred way.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据