4.4 Article

Strain-induced variation of bandgap in (111) In2O3 epitaxial films grown on c-sapphire substrates by a pulsed laser deposition technique

期刊

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6641/abda02

关键词

epitaxy; strain effect; optical bandgap; oxide semiconductor; pulsed laser deposition; x-ray diffraction

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India [CRG/2018/001343]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study explores the effects of growth temperature, time, oxygen partial pressure, and cooling conditions on the structural and electronic properties of In2O3 epitaxial films. It has been observed that the overall strain can transition from compressive to tensile by altering the growth parameters, leading to a systematic variation in the bandgap of the material.
The structural and electronic properties of In2O3 epitaxial films grown on c-sapphire substrates by a pulsed laser deposition technique are studied as functions of various growth conditions. Our study shows that growth temperature, growth time, oxygen partial pressure, and post-growth cooling conditions play important roles in governing the magnitude and character of the overall change in unit cell volume (volume strain) of the lattice. It is found that biaxial strain, which is developed due to lattice and thermal expansion coefficient mismatches between the layer and the substrate, leads to overall compression of the lattice. Interestingly, a hydrostatic tensile strain is found to coexist with biaxial strain in samples, which, following growth, are cooled to room temperature at a rate much slower than the natural rate of cooling. It has been observed that the overall strain can be varied from compressive to tensile by changing the growth parameters. The study further shows a systematic variation of the bandgap (from 3.8 to 3.1 eV) with a change in the unit cell volume of these layers, demonstrating the strong influence of strain on the band structural properties of the material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据