4.5 Article

Citation inequality and the Journal Impact Factor: median, mean, (does it) matter?

期刊

SCIENTOMETRICS
卷 126, 期 2, 页码 1249-1269

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03812-y

关键词

Journal Impact Factor; Citation distribution; Skewed distribution; Journal quality; Article citedness

资金

  1. Paracelsus Medical University
  2. WISS 2025 project 'IDA-Lab Salzburg' by the Federal Government of Salzburg, Austria [20204-WISS/225/197-2019, 20102-F1901166-KZP]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Skewed citation distribution is a major limitation of the Journal Impact Factor (JIF), with highly-cited articles serving as outliers. Replacing mean citation values with the median resulted in significantly lower numerical values, indicating a more accurate representation of the citation distribution. The study provides comprehensive insights into the prevalence, extent, and consequences of citation inequality in medical and all-category journals listed in the JCR.
Skewed citation distribution is a major limitation of the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) representing an outlier-sensitive mean citation value per journal The present study focuses primarily on this phenomenon in the medical literature by investigating a total of n = 982 journals from two medical categories of the Journal Citation Report (JCR). In addition, the three highest-ranking journals from each JCR category were included in order to extend the analyses to non-medical journals. For the journals in these cohorts, the citation data (2018) of articles published in 2016 and 2017 classified as citable items (CI) were analysed using various descriptive approaches including e.g. the skewness, the Gini coefficient, and, the percentage of CI contributing 50% or 90% of the journal's citations. All of these measures clearly indicated an unequal, skewed distribution with highly-cited articles as outliers. The %CI contributing 50% or 90% of the journal's citations was in agreement with previously published studies with median values of 13-18% CI or 44-60% CI generating 50 or 90% of the journal's citations, respectively. Replacing the mean citation values (corresponding to the JIF) with the median to represent the central tendency of the citation distributions resulted in markedly lower numerical values ranging from - 30 to - 50%. Up to 39% of journals showed a median citation number of zero in one medical journal category. For the two medical cohorts, median-based journal ranking was similar to mean-based ranking although the number of possible rank positions was reduced to 13. Correlation of mean citations with the measures of citation inequality indicated that the unequal distribution of citations per journal is more prominent and, thus, relevant for journals with lower citation rates. By using various indicators in parallel and the hitherto probably largest journal sample, the present study provides comprehensive up-to-date results on the prevalence, extent and consequences of citation inequality across medical and all-category journals listed in the JCR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据