4.7 Article

Exogenous application of phytosulfokine α (PSKα) delays senescence in broccoli florets during cold storage by ensuring intracellular ATP availability and avoiding intracellular ROS accumulation

期刊

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
卷 276, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109745

关键词

Alternative oxidase; Florets yellowing; Intracellular ATP availability; mPTP opening; Phytosulfokine alpha

资金

  1. Imam Khomeini International University (IKIU)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that treatment with 150 nM PSK alpha can delay senescence in broccoli florets by increasing the expression of SnRK1 gene and enhancing the activity of H+-ATPase, Ca2+-ATPase, SDH, and CCO. Additionally, higher expression of AOX and UCP1 genes can reduce H2O2 accumulation, while lower mPTP opening can prevent ROS accumulation in broccoli florets.
During postharvest life, broccoli suffers from florets yellowing, which reduces its economic and nutritional value. We investigated the mechanisms employed by exogenous phytosulfokine alpha (PSK alpha) applying at 150 nM for delaying senescence in broccoli florets stored at 4 degrees C for 28 days. The results showed that the SnRK1 gene expression was higher in broccoli florets treated with 150 nM PSK alpha, which may warrant sufficient intracellular availability of ATP, resulted from a higher activity of H+-ATPase, Ca2+-ATPase, succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), and cytochrome c oxidase (CCO). In addition, avoiding H2O2 accumulation by higher expression of alternative oxidase (AOX) and uncoupling protein (UCP1) genes may arise from higher SnRK1 gene expression. Additionally, lower mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) opening may avoid ROS accumulation in broccoli florets treated with 150 nM PSK alpha. Taken together, our results assume that exogenous PSK alpha application as signaling bioactive peptide could be considered as a promising procedure for delaying senescence of broccoli florets during cold storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据