4.7 Review

Early warning of COVID-19 via wastewater-based epidemiology: potential and bottlenecks

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 767, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145124

关键词

COVID-19 surveillance; Epidemic early warning; Wastewater-based epidemiology; Fecal shedding; Virus genome recovery

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [JPwm0125001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) is an important tool in the early warning system for COVID-19 pandemic, with the shedding dynamics of infected individuals and back-calculation of observed viral load being major bottlenecks. Optimal sampling strategy is crucial for the success of WBE projects.
An effective early warning tool is of great administrative and social significance to the containment and control of an epidemic. Facing the unprecedented global public health crisis caused by COVID-19, wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) has been given high expectations as a promising surveillance complement to clinical testing which had been plagued by limited capacity and turnaround time. In particular, recent studies have highlighted the role WBE may play in being a part of the early warning system. In this study, we briefly discussed the basics of the concept, the benefits and critical points of such an application, the challenges faced by the scientific community, the progress made so far, and what awaits to be addressed by future studies to make the concept work. We identified that the shedding dynamics of infected individuals, especially in the form of a mathematical shedding model, and the back-calculation of the number of active shedders from observed viral load are the major bottlenecks of WBE application in the COVID-19 pandemic that deserve more attention, and the sampling strategy (location, timing, and interval) needs to be optimized to fit the purpose and scope of the WBE project. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据