4.2 Article

Multivariate conditional transformation models

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS
卷 49, 期 1, 页码 116-142

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sjos.12501

关键词

constrained optimization; copula; marginal distributions; most likely transformations; multivariate regression; normalizing flows; seemingly unrelated regression

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [KL 3037/1-1, KN 922/9-1]
  2. Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Forderung derWissenschaftlichen Forschung [200021-184603]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regression models are an important aspect of contemporary regression analysis, but often rely on simplistic assumptions. We propose a general framework for multivariate conditional transformation models that can describe the entire distribution in a tractable and interpretable yet flexible way, allowing for non-linear effects of covariates and likelihood-based inference.
Regression models describing the joint distribution of multivariate responses conditional on covariate information have become an important aspect of contemporary regression analysis. However, a limitation of such models are the rather simplistic assumptions often made, for example, a constant dependence structure not varying with covariates or the restriction to linear dependence between the responses. We propose a general framework for multivariate conditional transformation models that overcomes these limitations and describes the entire distribution in a tractable and interpretable yet flexible way conditional on nonlinear effects of covariates. The framework can be embedded into likelihood-based inference, including results on asymptotic normality, and allows the dependence structure to vary with covariates. In addition, it scales well-beyond bivariate response situations, which were the main focus of most earlier investigations. We illustrate the benefits in a trivariate analysis of childhood undernutrition and demonstrate empirically that complex truly multivariate data-generating processes can be inferred from observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据