4.3 Article

A BRD's (BiRD's) eye view of BET and BRPF bromodomains in neurological diseases

期刊

REVIEWS IN THE NEUROSCIENCES
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 403-426

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/revneuro-2020-0067

关键词

acetylation readers; BET and BRPF bromodomains; epigenetic regulators; neurological diseases

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology [BT/PR27426/MED/122/140/2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurological disorders are a leading cause of disability globally, with epigenetic regulation playing a key role. The acetylation machinery components BRPF and BET are believed to play important roles in various diseases. Researchers suggest that these proteins may act as key players in NLDs.
Neurological disorders (NLDs) are among the top leading causes for disability worldwide. Dramatic changes in the epigenetic topography of the brain and nervous system have been found in many NLDs. Histone lysine acetylation has prevailed as one of the well characterised epigenetic modifications in these diseases. Two instrumental components of the acetylation machinery are the evolutionarily conserved Bromodomain and PHD finger containing (BRPF) and Bromo and Extra terminal domain (BET) family of proteins, also referred to as acetylation 'readers'. Several reasons, including their distinct mechanisms of modulation of gene expression and their property of being highly tractable small molecule targets, have increased their translational relevance. Thus, compounds which demonstrated promising results in targeting these proteins have advanced to clinical trials. They have been established as key role players in pathologies of cancer, cardiac diseases, renal diseases and rheumatic diseases. In addition, studies implicating the role of these bromodomains in NLDs are gaining pace. In this review, we highlight the findings of these studies, and reason for the plausible roles of all BET and BRPF members in NLDs. A comprehensive understanding of their multifaceted functions would be radical in the development of therapeutic interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据