4.5 Review

Impact of COVID-19 on the thyroid gland: an update

期刊

REVIEWS IN ENDOCRINE & METABOLIC DISORDERS
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 803-815

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11154-020-09615-z

关键词

Thyroid; COVID-19; Hyperthyroidism; Hypothyroidism; Thyroid cancer

资金

  1. Universita della Svizzera italiana

向作者/读者索取更多资源

COVID-19 has been shown to have a potential impact on the thyroid gland and the entire hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid (HPT) axis. Evidence suggests that COVID-19-related thyroid disorders include thyrotoxicosis, hypothyroidism, and nonthyroidal illness syndrome. Treatment plans for thyroid cancer are also shifting towards more teleconsultations due to the pandemic.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the pandemic of the new millennium. COVID-19 can cause both pulmonary and systemic inflammation, potentially determining multi-organ dysfunction. Data on the relationship between COVID-19 and thyroid have been emerging, and rapidly increasing since March 2020. The thyroid gland and the virus infection with its associated inflammatory-immune responses are known to be engaged in complex interplay. SARS-CoV-2 uses ACE2 combined with the transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) as the key molecular complex to infect the host cells. Interestingly, ACE2 and TMPRSS2 expression levels are high in the thyroid gland and more than in the lungs. Our literature search provided greater evidence that the thyroid gland and the entire hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid (HPT) axis could be relevant targets of damage by SARS-CoV-2. Specifically, COVID-19-related thyroid disorders include thyrotoxicosis, hypothyroidism, as well as nonthyroidal illness syndrome. Moreover, we noticed that treatment plans for thyroid cancer are considerably changing in the direction of more teleconsultations and less diagnostic and therapeutical procedures. The current review includes findings that could be changed soon by new results on the topic, considering the rapidity of worldwide research on COVID-19.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据