4.7 Article

A new route for separation and recovery of Fe, Al and Ti from red mud

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105314

关键词

Red mud; Pre-reducing-smelting; Alkaline leaching; Acid leaching; Stepwise extraction

资金

  1. Co-Innovation Center for Clean and Efficient Utilization of Strategic Metal Mineral Resources of Hunan Province
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51474161]
  3. Innovation-driven Project of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region [AA18242003, AA148242003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a new method to fully recover Fe, Al2O3 and TiO2 from red mud, consisting of pre-reducing-smelting, alkaline leaching and acid leaching procedures. The innovative route aims to achieve comprehensive and clean utilization of red mud by effectively recovering iron, aluminum and titanium.
Red mud is one kind of by-products rejected from industrial production of alumina plant and characterized by high content of alkaline and containing many valuable metals such as iron, aluminum, titanium, etc. It is urgent to effectively utilize red mud for the sustainable development of aluminum metallurgy industry. In this paper, a new route was proposed to fully recover Fe, Al2O3 and TiO2 from the red mud, which includes three procedures, i.e. pre-reducing-smelting, alkaline leaching and acid leaching. The pre-reducing-smelting step was employed to recover iron from the mud, producing pig iron at an iron recovery of some 98.15% and slag containing 43.17% Al2O3 and 15.71%TiO2, respectively. Then, based on the thermal dynamic calculations, a modification of the slag-alkaline leaching and hydrochloric acid leaching process were conducted to obtain the stepwise recovery of Al2O3 and TiO2, respectively, from the smelting slag. Aluminum and titanium were recovered in the form of sodium aluminum solution and perovskite at a recovery of 85.85% and 95.53%, respectively. The innovative route is probably a potential way to achieve comprehensive and clean utilization of red mud.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据