4.7 Article

MCDM-based multidimensional approach for selection of optimal groundwater pumping systems: Design and case example

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 163, 期 -, 页码 213-224

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.079

关键词

Groundwater pumping; Economic-energy-environment analysis; Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM); AHP/TOPSIS Method

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [TIN2017e86647eP]
  2. Fundacion Seneca (Region of Murcia, Spain) [19882eGERMe15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study estimates and classifies optimal groundwater pumping solutions based on various energy resources and water storage options. A multi-criteria decision making process is applied using AHP and TOPSIS methods to identify and prioritize the solutions. The study focuses on a case study in southeast Spain and discusses potential energy and water storage options.
Herein, optimal groundwater pumping solutions based on a variety of energy resources and water storage options are estimated and classified. Each energy source and water storage option is first characterized considering energy, economic, and environmental criteria. A multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) process based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is subsequently applied to identify and classify the optimal groundwater pumping solutions under such a multidimensional framework. An aquifer located in the southeast of Spain is analyzed in a case study to assess the proposed optimal MCDM-based approach. Conventional diesel-based equipment, solar PV power plants, and direct grid connection, as well as three water storage systems--direct pumping, seasonal storage, and annual storage--are identified as potential energy sources and water storage options, respectively. Characterization and visualization of these energy and water storage systems, as well as prioritized option results, are also discussed herein. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据