4.7 Article

Heat depletion in sedimentary basins and its effect on the design and electric power output of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) systems

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 172, 期 -, 页码 1393-1403

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.11.145

关键词

CO2 geothermal; Geothermal electricity; CCUS; Reservoir heat depletion; Sedimentary basin geothermal

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) Sustainable Energy Pathways (SEP) program grant [1230691]
  2. Initiative for Renewable Energy (IREE)
  3. Werner Siemens Foundation (Werner SiemensStiftung)
  4. U.S. National Science Foundation Innovations at the Nexus of Food, Energy, and Water Systems (INFEWS) program [1739909]
  5. U.S. National Science Foundation National Research Traineeship Program [1922666]
  6. Sloan Foundation
  7. Direct For Education and Human Resources
  8. Division Of Graduate Education [1922666] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) energy systems can efficiently extract geothermal energy from sedimentary basins by optimizing well spacing. The spacing of wells significantly impacts electricity generation and reservoir heat depletion over time. Proper planning and design are crucial for maximizing electric generation and prolonging reservoir heat retention.
CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) energy systems circulate geologically stored CO2 to extract geothermal heat from naturally permeable sedimentary basins. CPG systems can generate more electricity than brine systems in geologic reservoirs with moderate temperature and permeability. Here, we numerically simulate the temperature depletion of a sedimentary basin and find the corresponding CPG electricity generation variation over time. We find that for a given reservoir depth, temperature, thickness, permeability, and well configuration, an optimal well spacing provides the largest average electric generation over the reservoir lifetime. If wells are spaced closer than optimal, higher peak electricity is generated, but the reservoir heat depletes more quickly. If wells are spaced greater than optimal, reservoirs maintain heat longer but have higher resistance to flow and thus lower peak electricity is generated. Additionally, spacing the wells 10% greater than optimal affects electricity generation less than spacing wells 10% closer than optimal. Our simulations also show that for a 300 m thick reservoir, a 707 m well spacing provides consistent electricity over 50 years, whereas a 300 m well spacing yields large heat and electricity reductions over time. Finally, increasing injection or production well pipe diameters does not necessarily increase average electric generation. (c) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据