4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of sisal waste by sequential pretreatment with UV-catalyzed alkaline hydrogen peroxide and ionic liquid

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 169, 期 -, 页码 1157-1165

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.075

关键词

Combinatorial pretreatment; UV-Catalyzed alkaline hydrogen peroxide process; Ionic liquid; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Sisal waste

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31371743]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China [2016A050503017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study employed a two-step sequential approach with UV-catalyzed alkaline hydrogen peroxide and ionic liquid treatment to achieve high saccharification in sisal waste, resulting in increased lignin removal, cellulose content, and reduced crystallinity index.
Combinatorial pretreatment is widely recognized as a promising strategy for bioconversion of lignocellulosic feedstock. In this study, a two-step sequential approach with UV-catalyzed alkaline hydrogen peroxide (UHP) process and ionic liquid (IL) treatment was performed on sisal waste in order to achieve a higher saccharification. The integrated UHP-IL pretreatment removed lignin by 79.2%, increased cellulose content to 73.5% and reduced the crystallinity index to 16.2%. The maximum reducing sugar yield of 69.2 g/100 g dry sisal waste and sugar conversion of 89.4% were attained by UHP pretreatment with 0.1 g/g hydrogen peroxide for 6 h followed by IL pretreatment with 20 mL/g tetrabutylammonium hydroxide at 60 degrees C for 40 min and enzymatic hydrolysis for 36 h with enzyme loading of 10 FPU/g. Kinetic modeling analysis revealed that UHP-IL process promoted the adsorption and binding of the substrate to enzymes via its combination effect of delignification and decrystallization, which increased the initial rate of enzymatic hydrolysis and the yield of reducing sugar. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据