4.8 Review

Sustainability check for bio-based technologies: A review of process-based and life cycle approaches

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110213

关键词

Bioeconomy; Biomass; Circular economy; Key enabling technologies; Life cycle assessment; Techno-economic analysis

资金

  1. project Sustainable Trade and Innovation Transfer in the Bioeconomy' (STRIVE) [031B0019]
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  3. German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Industries worldwide are transitioning to renewable biological feedstock for sustainable development, with Key Enabling Technologies enhancing biomass conversion efficiency. A systematic review evaluates the sustainability of advanced bio-based technologies, and the implementation of cradle-to-cradle systems faces challenges. Further harmonisation of Life Cycle Assessments is needed for comparing technologies in different contexts.
Industries across the world are making a transition from fossil resources to renewable biological feedstock for the production of chemicals, fuels, and materials, as a strategy to promote sustainable development and economic growth. However, limited biomass availability can halt the expansion of bio-based sectors, unless alternative raw materials are employed and cascading uses are implemented on a large scale. Key Enabling Technologies (KETs) can contribute to feedstock diversification and improved biomass conversion efficiencies along supply chains, although concerns arise about their actual viability and competitiveness. A systematic review of Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) and related process-based approaches is carried out to evaluate the sustainability of advanced bio-based technologies, defined as those that use either non-food feedstock or circularity principles -or both- for delivering diverse products. A classification scheme is proposed to categorise KETs based on the feedstock employed (plant residues and perennials, designer crops, algae, or biological waste) or the underlying technological configuration (enzyme/microbial assisted processing or biorefineries). Results show that producing biofuels and biochemicals from perennial plants, lignocellulosic residues and algae has advantages in terms of greenhouse gas emissions relative to their fossil counterparts, while trade-offs occur with other environmental impacts and sustainability dimensions. Cradle-to-cradle systems can deliver additional sustainability gains, but their implementation poses technical and socio-political challenges. Further harmonisation of LCA methodologies is desirable to compare KETs in different sectoral, geographical and policy contexts. In spite of the diversity of outcomes and approaches, this review provides an overview of advanced bio-based technologies, while shedding light on the often overestimated sustainability benefits of the bioeconomy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据