4.7 Article

Resilience analysis of maritime transportation systems based on importance measures

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107461

关键词

Reliability; resilience; importance measure; maritime transportation system

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [72071182, U1904211]
  2. ministry of education's humanities and social sciences planning fund [20YJA630012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines the residual resilience management of ports and routes in the maritime transportation system (MTS) and prioritizes their restoration to enhance the system's ability to handle disruptions and minimize losses. A new method is proposed to optimize resilience management in MTS, with a focus on ports and routes. The applicability of the proposed method is demonstrated using sea routes involving 23 cities.
In maritime transportation system (MTS), ports and ocean routes are essential for establishing and maintaining effective international trade routes. However, the ability of the ports to send and receive goods can be easily destroyed by political and natural interferences. This will cause a significant negative socio-economic impact such as port operation suspension and route disruption. Effectively implementing resilience management in MTS can therefore improve its ability to handle interruptions and minimizing losses. Based on the post-disaster analysis, this paper proposes a new method to optimize the residual resilience management of ports and routes in MTS and proposes an optimal resilience model. The residual resilience is then applied to some importance measures. The Copeland method is used to comprehensively rank the importance of ports and routes. The restoration priority of interrupted ports and routes of different importance measures for the purpose of minimizing residual resilience is also studied. Sea routes consisting of 23 cities are used to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据