4.7 Article

Distribution-free polynomial chaos expansion surrogate models for efficient structural reliability analysis

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107256

关键词

Structural reliability; MCS; PCE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In complex stochastic high-dimensional reliability studies, polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) is widely used, but faces challenges due to incomplete information on variable distributions and complex dependency structures. A distribution-free PCE approach is proposed, computing joint raw moments for surrogate model development, demonstrating an efficient and accurate alternative to traditional PCE through illustrative examples.
In complex stochastic high-dimensional reliability studies, polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) has been widely used to build surrogate models in lieu of prohibitively expensive Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). PCE relies on parametric distributions for associated variables and appropriate basis functions. However, incomplete or imperfect information on the stochastic variables can limit its use; accepted parametric forms for variable distributions, for instance, may not be justified when variables display multimodal character or mixed discrete-continuous support. Also, the dependency structure among the random variables may be complex, which can make probabilistic mapping or transformation to independent variables needed for PCE cumbersome. Nonlinearities in such transformations can affect the accuracy of PCE surrogate models and lead to slower convergence relative to truth system computations of desired QoIs (quantities of interest). To address these challenges, a distribution-free PCE approach is proposed. We compute joint raw moments of underlying random input variables for Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization in developing surrogate models. Using illustrative examples, we demonstrate the proposed approach as an efficient and accurate surrogate model-building alternative to traditional PCE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据