4.7 Article

The Biological Meaning of Radiomic Features

期刊

RADIOLOGY
卷 298, 期 3, 页码 505-516

出版社

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA (RSNA)
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021202553

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [U01 CA143062, U54 CA143970]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radiomic analysis provides a powerful tool for extracting clinically relevant information from radiologic imaging, but the data-driven nature of radiomics inherently lacks insights into the biological underpinnings of observed relationships.
Radiomic analysis offers a powerful tool for the extraction of clinically relevant information from radiologic imaging. Radiomics can be used to predict patient outcome through automated high-throughput feature extraction, using large training cohorts to elucidate subtle relationships between image characteristics and disease status. However powerful, the data-driven nature of radiomics inherently offers no insight into the biological underpinnings of the observed relationships. Early radiomics work was dominated by analysis of semantic, radiologist-defined features and carried qualitative real-world meaning. Following the rapid developments and popularity of machine learning approaches, the field moved quickly toward high-throughput agnostic analyses, resulting in increasingly large feature sets. This trend took the focus toward an increase in predictive power and further away from a biological understanding of the findings. Such a disconnect between predictor model and biological meaning will inherently limit broad clinical translation. Efforts to reintroduce biological meaning into radiomics are gaining traction in the field with distinct emerging approaches available, including genomic correlates, local microscopic pathologic image textures, and macroscopic histopathologic marker expression. These methods are presented in this review, and their significance is discussed. The authors predict that following the increasing pressure for robust radiomics, biological validation will become a standard practice in the field, thus further cementing the role of the method in clinical decision making. (C) RSNA, 2021

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据