4.4 Article

RADIOCARBON DATING OF PRECIOUS CORALS OFF THE SOUTHWEST COAST OF KOCHI PREFECTURE, SOUTHWEST JAPAN

期刊

RADIOCARBON
卷 63, 期 1, 页码 195-212

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/RDC.2020.114

关键词

precious coral; fishing resources; Kuroshio Current; radiocarbon dating

资金

  1. NonGovernment Organization of the Precious Coral Protection
  2. Development Association and Japan Coral Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radiocarbon dating of precious coral colony fragments collected off the southwest coast of Kochi Prefecture, Japan, revealed that most coral deaths were due to natural causes and that precious corals started inhabiting the area at least around 7500 years ago. These findings could help establish sustainable fishery regulations.
Radiocarbon (C-14) dating was performed for various types of precious coral colony fragments collected from the Ashizuri fishing field, around 100-200 m deep, off the southwest coast of Kochi Prefecture, Japan, to understand the historical background of one of the largest precious coral fishing fields in Japan. The 14C ages of the 55 specimens range from similar to 7500 years ago to the modern. Most of the measured samples were older than 1871, when fishing activities of precious corals began in Kochi Prefecture. These results suggest that most of the deaths of the precious coral colonies were due to natural causes, such as natural mortality, predation, or various forms of environmental degradation, and not strictly related to destructive fishing practices. Additionally, precious corals started inhabiting the study area at least similar to 7500 years ago, when the marine condition became similar to that of today after the Last Glacial Period. This study is the first to focus on the age of dead precious coral fragments and has revealed that they might be an important fossil resource that could lengthen the timespan of precious coral fishery. This additional time may enable us to establish reasonable and effective regulations for sustainable fishery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据