4.4 Article

RADIOCARBON DATING OF A LATE ANTIQUE NECROPOLIS FROM FELANITX (MALLORCA, BALEARIC ISLANDS)

期刊

RADIOCARBON
卷 63, 期 2, 页码 727-739

出版社

UNIV ARIZONA DEPT GEOSCIENCES
DOI: 10.1017/RDC.2020.122

关键词

cemetery; dating; human remains; island

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades [HAR2017-83335-P]
  2. European Regional Development Fund from the European Commission
  3. Comissionat per a Universitats i Recerca del DIUE de la Generalitat de Catalunya [2017 SGR 1043]
  4. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades from the Spanish Goverment
  5. Beatriu de Pinos postdoctoral fellowship from the AGAUR
  6. Secretaria d'Universitats i Recerca of the Departament d'Economia i Coneixement of the Generalitat de Catalunya

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Excavations in the village of Felanitx on the eastern part of Mallorca have uncovered a small necropolis with inhumations lacking grave goods except for a bronze belt buckle. Carbon dating has confirmed a Late Antique chronology for the graves.
The excavation of a building in the village of Felanitx in the eastern part of the island of Mallorca (Balearic Islands) has revealed the existence of a small necropolis. The inhumations did not provide grave goods except for a bronze belt buckle for which the typological study suggests a Late Antique chronology. The stratigraphical sequence however seems to suggest a possible evolution of the space across time since some graves are cut by others. In order to obtain an absolute date for the necropolis and to verify if there are chronological differences between the graves, a total of 6 human bones samples have been C-14 dated by AMS. The results of the radiocarbon dating confirm a Late Antique chronology (4th to 7th century AD) for the graves but do not suggest a chronological evolution. Despite the fact that the knowledge of the necropolis is still fragmentary, the results are extremely important because they provide an absolute date for a Late Antique necropolis in the Mallorcan rural area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据