4.5 Article

Validation of the Impact Index: can we measure disease effects on quality of life in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis?

期刊

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 1191-1198

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02728-7

关键词

Patient-reported outcomes; Reliability; Validity; Quality of life; Functional status; Hip and knee osteoarthritis

资金

  1. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute(R) (PCORI) Award (CDR) [1503-28799]
  2. Healthwise, Incorporated

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Impact Index has shown strong evidence of validity, reliability, and responsiveness in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis, demonstrating its effectiveness in measuring the impact of health problems on quality of life.
Purpose To validate the Impact Index, a short, publicly available scale that measures the extent to which a respondent's health problem adversely impacts their quality of life. Methods Secondary analysis of patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis surveyed after visiting a surgeon at baseline (N = 322) and about 6 months after the visit (N = 283). Patients responded to the Impact Index and previously validated questionnaires about overall health, pain, and function. The Impact Index includes four questions that ask how much the respondent is bothered, worried, limited, or in pain due to their health condition over the past 30 days. Total scores range from 0 to 12; higher scores indicate more deleterious impact. Results Patients were mostly female (55%), majority white (95%), had an average age of 65 (SD = 9), and most had surgery (64%). The baseline Impact Index score was 9.48 (SD = 2.63); at follow up 4.75 (SD = 3.54). Impact Index was related to overall health at baseline (r = - 0.49). For knee patients at baseline, Impact Index was negatively related to their knee symptoms (r = - 0.49) and knee pain (r = - 0.67). For hip patients at baseline, Impact Index was negatively related to the Harris Hip score (r = - 0.62). Scale directions varied; however, the signs of all correlations were as hypothesized. The Impact Index was predictive of surgical choice (p < .001, OR = 1.45), however, overall health (p = .88) and comorbidity (p = .24) measures were not. Reliability was acceptable (alpha = 0.85). Responsiveness statistics suggested overall health, pain, function, and Impact Index measures reflected improvement patients experienced from surgery. The Impact Index had the largest effect sizes (> - 3.4) and Guyatt Responsiveness Statistics (> - 2.3). Conclusions The Impact Index demonstrated strong evidence of validity, reliability, and responsiveness in hip or knee osteoarthritis patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据