4.5 Article

Influence of microwave drying on the combustion characteristics of food waste

期刊

DRYING TECHNOLOGY
卷 34, 期 12, 页码 1397-1405

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2015.1118121

关键词

Combustion characteristic; combustion kinetic; food waste; microwave drying

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 program) [2011CB201500]
  2. Science and Technology Project of Hunan [2013SK3175, 2013SK3176]
  3. Foundation of Hunan Key Engineering Thermophysics Discipline [KFKT0501]
  4. Science and Technology Project of Hunan Provincial Department of Education [15C0716]
  5. Science and Technology Project of Loudi [2011ZD13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To study the influences of microwave drying on the combustion characteristics of food waste, this study conducted thermogravimetric analysis of cooked rice and vegetable leaves dried using a microwave at four intensities. The results suggested that dried rice and vegetable leaves were both favorable fuels, with higher comprehensive combustion characteristic indices than that of other biomass types such as straw, sawdust, etc. Microwave drying improved the combustion performance of food waste. The more intensive the microwave drying, the better the combustion performance of the food waste. Microwave drying significantly enhanced the combustion property of the selected vegetable leaves, while it exerted a slight influence on that of cooked rice. After microwave drying at 1500W, the combustion characteristic index of vegetable leaves was increased by 34.47% compared with electrically dried samples. However, the combustion characteristic index of rice merely showed an improvement of 8.12%. Analysis of the combustion kinetics of food waste using the Coats-Redfern equation revealed that microwave drying changed the combustion kinetics of food waste. That is to say, the combustion rate of the food waste was accelerated by reducing the activation energy at low temperatures and increasing the activation energy at high temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据