4.6 Article

Interplay of protein primary sequence, lipid membrane, and chaperone in β-barrel assembly

期刊

PROTEIN SCIENCE
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 624-637

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pro.4022

关键词

BamA; chaperone; electrophoretic mobility; folding kinetics; outer membrane protein; substrate specificity

资金

  1. IISER Bhopal
  2. Science and Engineering Research Board award [EMR/2016/001774]
  3. Department of Biotechnology [BT/PR28858/BRB/10/1718/2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that BamA is a substrate-independent promiscuous molecular chaperone, assisting unfolded OMP to overcome the kinetic barrier in assembly and accelerate folding. The primary sequence of OMP remains a vital determining factor in its assembly rate.
The outer membrane of a Gram-negative bacterium is a crucial barrier between the external environment and its internal physiology. This barrier is bridged selectively by beta-barrel outer membrane proteins (OMPs). The in vivo folding and biogenesis of OMPs necessitates the assistance of the outer membrane chaperone BamA. Nevertheless, OMPs retain the ability of independent self-assembly in vitro. Hence, it is unclear whether substrate-chaperone dynamics is influenced by the intrinsic ability of OMPs to fold, the magnitude of BamA-OMP interdependence, and the contribution of BamA to the kinetics of OMP assembly. We addressed this by monitoring the assembly kinetics of multiple 8-stranded beta-barrel OMP substrates with(out) BamA. We also examined whether BamA is species-specific, or nonspecifically accelerates folding kinetics of substrates from independent species. Our findings reveal BamA as a substrate-independent promiscuous molecular chaperone, which assists the unfolded OMP to overcome the kinetic barrier imposed by the bilayer membrane. We additionally show that while BamA kinetically accelerates OMP folding, the OMP primary sequence remains a vital deciding element in its assembly rate. Our study provides unexpected insights on OMP assembly and the functional relevance of BamA in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据