Oncologic outcome of radical prostatectomy versus radiotherapy as primary treatment for high and very high risk localized prostate cancer

Objective: To compare the oncologic outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) versus external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) +/- androgen deprivation therapy for primary treatment of high risk localized prostate cancer (CaP). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively-populated database for cases who underwent primary treatment for high risk localized CaP, had more than 2 years follow-up, and were treated since 2006. A total of 335 cases were studied of whom 291 underwent RP and 44 underwent EBRT. Clinical characteristics, biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were compared. Results: EBRT cases were older (p < .01; mean 71 years vs. 61 years) and had longer PSA doubling time (PSADT) (p = .03; median 4.8 years vs. 3.5 years) than RP. Race, pretreatment PSA and biopsy Gleason score were similar. Median follow-up was 5.1 (range: 2.3-12.8) years for RP versus 3.3 (range: 2-12.4) years for EBRT. Three- and 5-year BPFS were 42% and 36% after RP versus 86% and 75% after EBRT (p < .01). The rate of adjuvant/salvage therapy was 58% after RP versus 20% after EBRT (p < .01). Three- and 5-year MFS were 80% and 77% after RP versus 91% and 91% after EBRT (p = .11). Three-year CSS was 98% in both groups and OS was 97% after RP versus 94% after EBRT (p = .73). Conclusions: RP had higher rates of biochemical failure and adjuvant or salvage treatment versus EBRT in high risk localized CaP. MFS trended toward benefit after EBRT, but CSS and OS remained high in both groups.

Automated summary

The study compared the oncologic outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) + androgen deprivation therapy in high risk localized prostate cancer patients. The results showed that RP had higher rates of biochemical failure and adjuvant or salvage treatment, while EBRT trended towards benefit in metastasis-free survival. However, cancer-specific survival and overall survival remained high in both groups.