4.7 Article

Optoelectronic reciprocity in hot carrier solar cells with ideal energy selective contacts

期刊

PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 433-444

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pip.3386

关键词

dark I-V; energy selective contacts; hot carrier solar cells; optoelectronic reciprocity

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP170102677]
  2. UNSW Scientia Program
  3. AINSE Limited through a PGRA award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study discusses the experimental features of hot carrier solar cells in reverse electroluminescent mode and their differences from traditional solar cells. Through research, it was found that the hot carrier properties lead to deviations in the dark I-V curve of the cells from the typical Shockley diode equation, directly related to the increase in carrier temperature.
Hot carrier solar cells promise theoretical power conversion efficiencies far beyond the single junction limit. However, practical implementations of hot carrier solar cells have lagged far behind those theoretical predictions. Reciprocity relations for electroluminescence from conventional single junction solar cells have been extremely helpful in driving their efficiency ever closer to the theoretical limits. In this work, we discuss how the signatures of a functioning hot carrier device should manifest experimentally when driven in reverse, that is, in electroluminescent mode. Hot carrier properties lead to deviations of the dark I-V from the Shockley diode equation that is typical for conventional single junction solar cells. These deviations are directly linked to an increase in temperature of the carriers and therefore the temperature measured from electroluminescence spectra. We also elucidate how the behaviour of hot carrier solar cells in the dark depends on whether Auger processes play a significant role, revealing a stark contrast between the regime of negligible Auger recombination (carrier conservation model) and dominant Auger recombination (impact ionisation model) for hot carrier solar cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据