4.6 Review

Microbial production of medium-chain length polyhydroxyalkanoates

期刊

PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 102, 期 -, 页码 393-407

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2021.01.020

关键词

Medium-chain length poly(hydroxyalkanoates) (mcl-PHAs); Metabolic pathways; Bacterial cultivation; Extraction

资金

  1. FCT/MCTES , [Mar-Noruega/0001/2016, SFRH/BD/147518/2019, PTDC/BTA-BTA/30902/2017]
  2. Research Unit on Applied Molecular Biosciences (UCIBIO) [UID/04378/2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Medium-chain-length poly(hydroxyalkanoates), or mcl-PHAs, are naturally produced polymers known for their low crystallinity and material properties suitable for diverse applications. Despite their valuable properties, mcl-PHAs face limitations in commercial development due to high production and extraction costs.
Medium-chain-length poly(hydroxyalkanoates), mcl-PHAs, are naturally produced polymers characterized by material properties that include low crystallinity and low melting and glass transition temperatures, which render them suitable for diverse applications. These biodegradable and biocompatible biopolymers are accumulated as intracellular energy and carbon reserves by a wide range of bacteria, mainly, of the genus Pseudomonas. Despite their valuable properties, mcl-PHAs commercial development is still limited, mostly due to the high costs associated with their production and extraction. To overcome such problems, several approaches are being pursued comprising: the search for higher yielding strains, both wild-type and engineered bacteria; the utilization of low-cost feedstocks, such as wastes; and the development of environmentally and economically sustainable downstream procedures for polymer recovery and purification. Intensive research is also being done for the development of mcl-PHA-based materials for use in different areas, especially in high-value applications, such as biomedicine and drug delivery, in which the product's performance may justify its higher cost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据