4.7 Article

Differences in Quaternary co-divergence reveals community-wide diversification in the mountains of southwest China varied among species

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2567

关键词

comparative phylogeography; mountains of southwest China; diversification; riverine barrier; species pump; full-likelihood Bayesian computation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study used a statistical comparative phylogeography approach to analyze the biodiversity of the mountains of southwest China, revealing the impact of glacial cycles and emphasizing the importance of riverine barriers in the phylogeographic history of vertebrate communities.
The mountains of southwest China (MSWC) is a biodiversity hotspot with highly complex and unusual terrain. However, with the majority of studies focusing on the biogeographic consequences of massive mountain building, the Quaternary legacy of biodiversity for the MSWC has long been overlooked. Here, we took a statistical comparative phylogeography approach to examine factors that shaped community-wide diversification. With data from 30 vertebrate species, the results reveal spatially concordant genetic structure, and temporally clustered co-divergence events associated with river barriers during severe glacial cycles. This indicates the importance of riverine barriers in the phylogeographic history of the MSWC vertebrate community. We conclude that the repeated glacial cycles are associated with co-divergences that are themselves structured by the heterogeneity of the montane landscape of the MSWC. This orderly process of diversification has profound implications for conservation by highlighting the relative independence of different geographical areas in which some, but not all species in communities have responded similarly to climate change and calls for further comparative phylogeographic investigations to reveal the connection between biological traits and divergence pulses in this biodiversity hotspot.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据