4.7 Article

The extensibility of the plantar fascia influences the windlass mechanism during human running

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2095

关键词

foot arch biomechanics; plantar fascia; windlass mechanism; arch-spring; biplanar videoradiography; running

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP160101117]
  2. NSERC [RGPIN/04688-2015]
  3. Congress Travel Grant from the International Society of Biomechanics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human foot arch is both compliant and stiff during ground contact and push-off, thanks to the plantar fascia. The plantar fascia's role in shaping the arch and storing/releasing elastic energy is crucial, despite its stretching and shortening during gait.
The arch of the human foot is unique among hominins as it is compliant at ground contact but sufficiently stiff to enable push-off. These behaviours are partly facilitated by the ligamentous plantar fascia whose role is central to two mechanisms. The ideal windlass mechanism assumes that the plantar fascia has a nearly constant length to directly couple toe dorsiflexion with a change in arch shape. However, the plantar fascia also stretches and then shortens throughout gait as the arch-spring stores and releases elastic energy. We aimed to understand how the extensible plantar fascia could behave as an ideal windlass when it has been shown to strain throughout gait, potentially compromising the one-to-one coupling between toe arc length and arch length. We measured foot bone motion and plantar fascia elongation using high-speed X-ray during running. We discovered that toe plantarflexion delays plantar fascia stretching at foot strike, which probably modifies the distribution of the load through other arch tissues. Through a pure windlass effect in propulsion, a quasi-isometric plantar fascia's shortening is delayed to later in stance. The plantar fascia then shortens concurrently to the windlass mechanism, likely enhancing arch recoil at push-off.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据