4.8 Article

Affinity of small-molecule solutes to hydrophobic, hydrophilic, and chemically patterned interfaces in aqueous solution

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2020205118

关键词

inverse design; molecular simulation; membrane fouling; solvation free energy; surface adsorption

资金

  1. Center for Materials for Water and Energy Systems, an Energy Frontier Research Center - US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0019272]
  2. California NanoSystems Institute
  3. Materials Research Science and Engineering Center at University of California, Santa Barbara, through NSF Division of Materials Research Award [1720256]
  4. Materials Research Science and Engineering Center at University of California, Santa Barbara, through NSF Division of Computer and Network Systems Award [1725797]
  5. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (Division of Graduate Education [DGE] Award) [1144085]
  6. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE Award) [1650114]
  7. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1725797] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Materials Research [1720256] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [1725797] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance of membranes in water purification, especially in terms of fouling resistance, is influenced by the interactions between solvated species and membrane surfaces. Efforts to create fouling-resistant membranes often focus on hydrophilization of surfaces. However, molecular simulations show that solutes are attracted to both hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces, contradicting macroscopic measures which suggest solute affinity is higher on hydrophobic surfaces. This suggests that traditional macroscopic hydrophobicity metrics may not accurately predict solute-surface affinity, and that molecular-scale surface chemical patterning plays a significant role in influencing affinity.
Performance of membranes for water purification is highly influenced by the interactions of solvated species with membrane surfaces, including surface adsorption of solutes upon fouling. Current efforts toward fouling-resistant membranes often pursue surface hydrophilization, frequently motivated by macroscopic measures of hydrophilicity, because hydrophobicity is thought to increase solute-surface affinity. While this heuristic has driven diverse membrane functionalization strategies, here we build on advances in the theory of hydrophobicity to critically examine the relevance of macroscopic characterizations of solute-surface affinity. Specifically, we use molecular simulations to quantify the affinities to model hydroxyl- and methyl-functionalized surfaces of small, chemically diverse, charge-neutral solutes represented in produced water. We show that surface affinities correlate poorly with two conventional measures of solute hydrophobicity, gas-phase water solubility and oil-water partitioning. Moreover, we find that all solutes show attraction to the hydrophobic surface and most to the hydrophilic one, in contrast to macroscopically based hydrophobicity heuristics. We explain these results by decomposing affinities into direct solute interaction energies (which dominate on hydroxyl surfaces) and water restructuring penalties (which dominate on methyl surfaces). Finally, we use an inverse design algorithm to show how heterogeneous surfaces, with multiple functional groups, can be patterned to manipulate solute affinity and selectivity. These findings, importantly based on a range of solute and surface chemistries, illustrate that conventional macroscopic hydrophobicity metrics can fail to predict solute-surface affinity, and that molecular-scale surface chemical patterning significantly influences affinity-suggesting design opportunities for water purification membranes and other engineered interfaces involving aqueous solute-surface interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据