4.7 Article

Discrimination of common defects in loquat fruit cv. 'Algerie' using hyperspectral imaging and machine learning techniques

期刊

POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 171, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2020.111356

关键词

Eriobotrya japonica; Quality; Non-destructive; Artificial vision; Classification; Multivariate analysis

资金

  1. FEDER funds [RTA2015-00078-00-00, P1D2019-107347RR-C31, P1D2019-107347RR-C32, PID2019-107347RR-C33]
  2. INIA for the FPI-INIA [43 (CPR2014-0082)]
  3. European Union FSE funds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Loquat fruit is economically important in certain regions of Spain, but is prone to mechanical damage and physiological disorders. Hyperspectral imaging using VIS and NIR was successful in distinguishing between external and internal defects in loquat cv. 'Algerie', with the XGBoost classifier outperforming the RF classifier with success rates ranging from 95.9% to 97.5% in different classification approaches.
Loquat (Eriobotrya japonica L.) is an important fruit for the economy of some regions of Spain that is very susceptible to mechanical damage and physiological disorders. These problems depreciate its value and prevent it from being exported. Visible (VIS) and near infrared (NIR) hyperspectral imaging was used to discriminate between external and internal common defects of loquat cv. 'Algerie'. Two classifiers, random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boost (XGBoost), and different spectral pre-processing techniques were evaluated in terms of their capacity to distinguish between sound and defective features according to three approaches. In the first approach the fruit pixels were classified into two classes, sound or defect, with a 97.5% rate of success; in the second the defective features were considered internal or external defects, achieving a 96.7% rate of success; and in the third approach each type of defect, i.e. purple spot, bruising, scars and flesh browning, were considered separately with a correct classification rate of 95.9%. The results indicated that the XGBoost classifier was the best method in all cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据