4.7 Article

L-asparaginase immobilized p(HEMA-GMA) cryogels: A recent study for biochemical, thermodynamic and kinetic parameters

期刊

POLYMER TESTING
卷 93, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106980

关键词

p(HEMA-GMA) cryogel; Immobilization; L-asparaginase; Enzyme stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

L-asparaginase was successfully immobilized on cryogels with high efficiency and stability, showing improved catalytic activity and thermal stability compared to the soluble enzyme. The immobilized enzyme also exhibited good storage stability and reusability, making it a promising carrier matrix for enzyme immobilization.
Cryogels have recently been attracted intense attention as suitable carriers for enzyme immobilization. Herein, L-asparaginase was selected as the model enzyme due to its application such as pharmaceutical and food. Under optimum conditions, L-asparaginase was immobilized on poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-glycidyl methacrylate) cryogels with 68.8% of immobilization yield and 69.3% of activity recovery. The immobilized enzyme exhibited improved stability with respect to the soluble enzyme at extreme conditions, especially around acidic pH and high temperature. Also, the storage stability and reusability of the immobilized enzyme were found to be approximately 54% and 52% of the original activity after 28 days at room temperature and 10 cycles, respectively. The thermodynamic studies indicated that activation energy (E-a) of the free enzyme decreased from 13.08 to 10.97 kJ/mol, which means an increase in the thermostability of L-asparaginase. The Michaelis-Menten constants (K-m) of 2.04 and 1.67 mM, and the maximum reaction rates (V-max) of 170.0 and 115.0 mu M min(-1) were estimated for soluble and immobilized L-asparaginase, respectively. These findings demonstrated that the designed cryogels turn out to be a good carrier matrix for L-asparaginase immobilization with high catalytic efficiency and enhanced stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据