4.7 Article

An electrochemical detection platform for selective and sensitive voltammetric determination of quercetin dosage in a food supplement by poly(9-(2-(pyren-1-yeethyl)-9h-carbazole) coated indium tin oxide electrode

期刊

POLYMER
卷 212, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.123300

关键词

Quercetin; 9-(2-(Pyren-1-yl) ethyl)-9H-carbazole; Indium tin oxide; Conductive polymer; Electrochemical sensor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel compound containing carbazole and pyrene units was synthesized and polymerized onto an ITO electrode for selective and sensitive voltammetric determination of Quercetin. After characterization studies, electro-polymerization of Pyr-Carb onto ITO surface significantly increased the oxidation current of QCT, allowing accurate determination of QCT in real samples. The fabricated sensor showed a linear range of 2.0-500 μM and a detection limit of 0.59 μM.
In proposed study, a novel compound containing carbazole (Carb) and pyrene (Pyr) units was synthesized and polymerized onto an indium tin oxide (ITO) electrode for selective and sensitive voltammetric determination of Quercetin (QCT). The characterization studies of the synthesized 9-(2-(pyren-1-yl) ethyl)-9H-carbazole (Pyr-Carb) were performed by NMR, LC-MS/MS, UV-Vis, Fluorescence and FT-IR measurements. Then, Pyr-Carb was electro-polymerized onto ITO by recording its cyclic voltammograms (CVs). Electro-oxidation behavior of QCT was investigated at bare ITO and poly (Pyr-Carb)/ITO by cyclic voltammetry (CV). The voltammetric measurements showed that the oxidation current of QCT significantly increased after electro polymerization of Pyr-Carb on the ITO surface. The range of linearity (ROL) and detection limit (DL) were found as 2.0-500 mu M and 0.59 mu M, respectively. The fabricated sensor was successfully tested on a Quercetin food supplement, and the obtained results indicated that the fabricated method enables sensitive, selective and accurate determination of QCT in real samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据