4.3 Article

Synthesis, Docking and Anticancer Evaluation of New Pyridine-3-Carbonitrile Derivatives

期刊

POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC COMPOUNDS
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 3523-3544

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10406638.2020.1870507

关键词

3-Cyanopyridinacetohydrazide; 1,3-Dioxole-5-carbaldehyde; 1,3,4-Oxadiazoles; Cytotoxicity; Docking study

资金

  1. Faculty of Womens for Arts, Science and Education, Ain Shams University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of reactions were conducted to synthesize benzohydrazide and nicotinonitrile derivatives, which were then tested for cytotoxicity against breast cancer cells. Some compounds showed lower half-maximal inhibitory concentrations, indicating potential anticancer activity.
N'-(2-((4-(Benzo[d][1, 3]dioxol-5-yl)-3-cyano-6-(naphthalen-2-yl)-pyridin-2-yl)oxy)- acetyl)benzohydrazide (6) and hydrazide derivatives (7-10) were synthesized via reaction of 3-cyano-pyridinacetohydrazide (5) with benzoylchloride and the appropriate aldehyde, respectively. Also, 4-(Benzo[d][1, 3]dioxol-5-yl)-2-(2-(3-methyl-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-2-oxoethoxy)-6-(naphthalen-2-yl) nicotinonitrile (11) was prepared through reaction of (5) with ethylacetoacetate. In addition, the hydrazide 5 was used as a starting material for synthesizing other nicotinonitrile derivatives (12, 13) and acetohydrazides (14, 15). Moreover, new 2, 5-disubsitituted-1,3,4-oxadiazoles (16, 17) were furnished by the reaction of (5) with benzoic acid derivatives. The cytotoxicity for some new compounds was investigated against human breast cancer MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines at concentrations (0, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 mu g/ml) using MTT assay. Compounds (4, 9, 14 and 17) were recorded the lowest half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50s) against MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines via cytotoxicity assays. These results were confirmed using molecular docking experiments. From the previous observations, we suggested that our synthesized compounds could be of great potential against breast cancer cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据