4.5 Article

Colonization and survival capacities underlying the multifaceted life of Rhodococcus sp. PBTS1 and PBTS2

期刊

PLANT PATHOLOGY
卷 70, 期 3, 页码 567-583

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ppa.13307

关键词

actinobacteria; cell wall‐ degrading enzymes; endophyte; epiphyte; functional genomics; motility

资金

  1. California Pistachio Research Board
  2. CSU Bakersfield

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that the survival and colonization capacities of the two pathogens causing pistachio bushy top syndrome (PBTS) differ in soil and plant tissues. Both bacteria exhibit chemotactic behavior, allowing them to form biofilms on the rhizoplane and phylloplane of the plant.
Little is known about the epidemiology of the newly emerged disease on pistachio rootstock designated pistachio bushy top syndrome (PBTS). Here, we analysed the survival and colonization capacities of the two causative agents, Rhodococcus corynebacterioides-like PBTS1 and R. fascians PBTS2, in the different habitats they occupy. Additionally, we examined their chromosomal sequences for genes that would support their ecology and provide experimental evidence for some of their predicted functions. We demonstrate that the soil competence of PBTS2 is better than that of PBTS1 and that both bacteria behave chemotactically, allowing them to translocate from soil to the rhizoplane. Once on the rhizoplane and the phylloplane, the PBTS bacteria form extensive epiphytic biofilms, probably aided by exopolysaccharide production. From these biofilms, the bacteria colonize the plant's interior tissues through the formation of ingression sites, likely created by the localized activity of cell wall-degrading enzymes. The observed systemic spreading of the PBTS strains throughout the plant tissues is probably mediated by surface motility and agrees with the occurrence of symptoms in both the aerial and root parts of the plant host. Based on all available information, we provide a working model on this pathosystem to be used as a conceptual framework for future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据