4.6 Review

Plant transporters: roles in stress responses and effects on growth and development

期刊

PLANT GROWTH REGULATION
卷 93, 期 3, 页码 253-266

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10725-020-00684-3

关键词

Abiotic stress; Heavy metals; Nutrient deficiency; Stress tolerance; Transporter

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31971410]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant transporters play crucial roles in nutrient acquisition, cellular homeostasis, and stress responses. Different transporter families have distinct functions in plants, contributing significantly to abiotic stress tolerance, plant growth, and yield. Understanding the mechanisms of plant transporters can reveal how plants respond to stress, benefiting genetic improvement in resistance breeding.
Plant transporters are crucial for nutrient acquisition, cellular homeostasis, and stress responses. They mediate the exchange of chemicals and signals inside and outside the biomembrane in plants. Therefore, the study of plant transporters is critical to understanding the mechanisms of plant stress tolerance, moreover, transporters have potential applications in crop breeding for improved stress tolerance. Here we review recent findings about different transporters family (ABC, MATE, NRAMP, KUP, COPT/Ctr, NPF, NRT, PHT, YSL, ZIP, STP, etc.), including their roles in abiotic stress tolerance, and plant growth and yield. Moreover, we highlight the roles of transporters in plant responses to abiotic stresses such as drought, waterlogging, salt and alkali, heavy metal stress, and nutrient deficiency. To clarify the mechanisms underlying the roles of transporters in various stress responses, we integrate information about transporter activity in plants under stress and thus reveal a link between nutrient accumulation and stress tolerance. Finally, we list genes with potential applications in genetic improvement of resistrance genes, and summarize and discuss these transporters for benefiting the research community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据