4.7 Article

Fucoidan mitigated diabetic nephropathy through the downregulation of PKC and modulation of NF-κB signaling pathway: in vitro and in vivo investigations

期刊

PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 2133-2144

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ptr.6966

关键词

Laminaria japonica polysaccharides; diabetic nephropathy; histopathological analysis; PKC/NF-kappa B

资金

  1. Key project at central government level: The ability establishment of sustainable use for valuable Chinese medicine resources [2060302]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2019BD055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the effects of sulfated polysaccharides from Laminaria japonica on diabetic nephropathy symptoms, showing that the polysaccharides regulate diabetic nephropathy through the PKC/NF-kappa B pathway.
The persistence of hyperglycemia and oxidative stress in diabetic patients ultimately leads to diabetic nephropathy (DN). In this study, we investigated the effect of sulfated polysaccharides (SPS) extracted from Laminaria japonica in relieving DN symptoms. To induce the diabetic model, normal rats were kept on a high-sugar, high-fat diet, then they were injected with streptozocin. Groups of these rats were later treated with SPS and/or protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor. The analyses performed herein demonstrate that although diabetes significantly decreases the body weights of rats, SPS and inhibitor treatments increase these weights, as well as the ratios of renal to total body weight. Serum biochemical analyses indicate that blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels gradually decrease in the SPS group. In addition, DN symptoms are substantially relieved by SPS and/or inhibitor treatments, as evidenced by histopathological analyses. Changes in the expressions of PKC-alpha, PKC-beta, P-selectin, nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B), and p65, detected by immunohistochemistry and western blot assessments, show that SPS regulates diabetic nephropathy via the PKC/NF-kappa B pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据