4.5 Article

Theoretical approach to quantum cascade micro-laser broadband multimode emission in strong magnetic fields

期刊

PHYSICS LETTERS A
卷 387, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2020.127007

关键词

Quantum cascade laser (QCL); Risken-Nummendal-Graham-Haken (RNGH) instability threshold; Self-pulsation; Quantum engineering; Micro-lasers

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) project FastIQ [IZ73Z0_152761]
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development (Republic of Serbia)
  3. COST ACTIONs [BM1205, MP1204]
  4. European Union [686731]
  5. Canton of Neuchatel
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [IZ73Z0_152761] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the influence of a magnetic field on multimode self-pulsations, revealing that an external magnetic field can slow down decoherence and diffusion rates in quantum cascade lasers, reducing the pump current required to achieve self-pulsations. As the magnetic field strength increases, the self-pulsation frequency and spectrum width remain practically unchanged.
We have theoretically explored the influence of the magnetic field on supporting the multimode Risken-Nummendal-Graham-Haken (RNGH) self-pulsations seen in the optical spectrum as two broad modulations sidebands at the Rabi flopping frequency [25-27]. On the example of microcavity quantum cascade lasers (mu-QCLs), we demonstrate that Landau quantization in an external magnetic field slows down the effective decoherence and diffusion rates. The pump current required to reach the broadband multimode RNGH self-pulsations is lowered with the magnetic field strength, while the Rabi flopping frequency and the overall optical spectrum width remain practically unchanged. Our theoretical results indicate that an external magnetic field can be a valuable tool for achieving high-power broadband QCL self-pulsations in practice. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据