4.6 Article

Performance evaluation of the mouse version of the LabPET II PET scanner

期刊

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 66, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abd952

关键词

positron emission tomography; mouse imaging; pixel detector; avalanche photodiode; submillimetric resolution

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. FRQS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

LabPET II is a new PET technology platform designed for high-resolution imaging, achieving submillimetric spatial resolution in preclinical and clinical settings. Results show promising capabilities for biomolecular imaging in preclinical research, with submillimetric resolution achieved in hot spot phantoms and exceptional contrast for tiny bone structures in mice.
The LabPET II is a new positron emission tomography technology platform designed to achieve submillimetric spatial resolution imaging using fully pixelated avalanche photodiodes-based detectors and highly integrated parallel front-end processing electronics. The detector was designed as a generic building block to develop devices for preclinical imaging of small to mid-sized animals and for clinical imaging of the human brain. The aim of this work is to assess the physical characteristics and imaging performance of the mouse version of LabPET II scanner following the NEMA NU4-2008 standard and using high resolution phantoms and in vivo imaging applications. A reconstructed spatial resolution of 0.78 mm (0.5 mu l) is measured close to the center of the radial field of view. With an energy window of 350 650 keV, the system absolute sensitivity is 1.2% and its maximum noise equivalent count rate reaches 61.1 kcps at 117 MBq. Submillimetric spatial resolution is achieved in a hot spot phantom and tiny bone structures were resolved with unprecedented contrast in the mouse. These results provide convincing evidence of the capabilities of the LabPET II technology for biomolecular imaging in preclinical research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据