4.8 Article

Localizing Transformations of the Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing Observable

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 126, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.021301

关键词

-

资金

  1. DOE [DE-SC0020247, DE-SC0015975]
  2. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI), MEXT, Japan
  3. Cottrell Scholar program of the Research Corporation for Science Advancement
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0020247, DE-SC0015975] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modern cosmological analyses of galaxy-galaxy lensing face a theoretical systematic effect arising from the nonlocality of the observed galaxy-galaxy lensing signal. The construction of a new observable allows for the removal of this nonlocality, leading to a significant extension in the range of usable scales in galaxy-galaxy lensing.
Modern cosmological analyses of galaxy-galaxy lensing face a theoretical systematic effect arising from the nonlocality of the observed galaxy-galaxy lensing signal. Because the predicted tangential shear signal at a given separation depends on the physical modeling on all scales internal to that separation, systematic uncertainties in the modeling of nonlinear small scales are propagated outward to larger scales. Even in the absence of other limiting factors, this systematic effect alone can necessitate conservative small-scale cuts, resulting in significant losses of information in the tangential shear data vector. We construct a simple linear transformation of the standard galaxy-galaxy observable that removes this nonlocality, which ensures that the cosmological signal contained within the transformed observable is exclusively drawn from well-understood physical scales. This new observable, through its robustness against nonlocality, also enables a significant extension in the range of usable scales in galaxy-galaxy lensing compared to the standard approach in current cosmological analyses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据