4.8 Article

Improved Limits for Violations of Local Position Invariance from Atomic Clock Comparisons

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 126, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.011102

关键词

-

资金

  1. EMPIR programme
  2. European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
  3. EMPIR projects [17FUN07, 18SIB05]
  4. Max-Planck-RIKEN-PTB-Center for Time, Constants and Fundamental Symmetries
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [CRC 1227]
  6. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study compared two optical clocks based on Yb-171+ and measured the frequency ratio of their electric quadrupole and electric octupole transitions, finding improved accuracy. The study also analyzed potential violations of physical laws and improved limits on the temporal variations of fundamental constants and the proton-to-electron mass ratio.
We compare two optical clocks based on the S-2(1/2)(F = 0) -> D-2(3/2) (F = 2) electric quadrupole (E2) and the S-2(1/2)(F = 0) -> F-2(7/2)(F = 3) electric octupole (E3) transition of Yb-171+ and measure the frequency ratio nu(E3)/nu(E2) = 0.932829404530965376(32), improving upon previous measurements by an order of magnitude. Using two caesium fountain clocks, we find nu(E3) = 642121496772645.10(8) Hz, the most accurate determination of an optical transition frequency to date. Repeated measurements of both quantities over several years are analyzed for potential violations of local position invariance. We improve by factors of about 20 and 2 the limits for fractional temporal variations of the fine structure constant alpha to 1.0(1.1) x 10(-18)/yr and of the proton-to-electron mass ratio mu to -8(36) x 10(-18)/yr. Using the annual variation of the Sun's gravitational potential at Earth Phi, we improve limits for a potential coupling of both constants to gravity, (c(2)/alpha)(d alpha/d Phi) = 14(11) x 10(-9) and (c(2)/mu)(d mu/d Phi) = 7(45) x 10(-8).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据