4.8 Article

Radial Spin Texture of the Weyl Fermions in Chiral Tellurium

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 125, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.216402

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [200020_188648, P2ELP2_181877, P300P2-171221]
  2. NCCR
  3. European Union Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program [ERC-StG-Neupert757867-PARATOP]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation [PP00P2_176877]
  5. ERC [695197]
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation NCCR:MUST Grant
  7. Department of Energy, Office of Science [DE-FG02-07ER46405]
  8. National Science Foundation [1144469]
  9. Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS) [s832, s1008]
  10. DOE Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  11. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P2ELP2_181877, 200020_188648] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  12. European Research Council (ERC) [695197] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  13. Division Of Graduate Education
  14. Direct For Education and Human Resources [1144469] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trigonal tellurium, a small-gap semiconductor with pronounced magneto-electric and magneto-optical responses, is among the simplest realizations of a chiral crystal. We have studied by spin- and angle-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy its unconventional electronic structure and unique spin texture. We identify Kramers-Weyl, composite, and accordionlike Weyl fermions, so far only predicted by theory, and show that the spin polarization is parallel to the wave vector along the lines in k space connecting high-symmetry points. Our results clarify the symmetries that enforce such spin texture in a chiral crystal, thus bringing new insight in the formation of a spin vectorial field more complex than the previously proposed hedgehog configuration. Our findings thus pave the way to a classification scheme for these exotic spin textures and their search in chiral crystals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据