4.8 Article

Using Diffuse Scattering to Observe X-Ray-Driven Nonthermal Melting

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 126, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.015703

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [16K17846]
  2. Helmholtz Association [VH-NG1141]
  3. Department of Energy, Laboratory Directed Research and Development program at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  4. Panofsky Fellowship
  5. Australian government through the Australian Research Councils Discovery Project [DP170100131]
  6. JSPS Japan-Australia Open Partnership Joint Research Project
  7. MEXT Q-LEAP Project
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K17846] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The experiment used a high-intensity x-ray pump to heat silicon samples, observing changes in ionic structure within 100 femtoseconds, resulting in a disordered, liquidlike state. The findings indicate that both phase change and disordered states are dominated by Coulomb forces rather than pure inertial behavior.
We present results from the SPring-8 Angstrom Compact free electron LAser facility, where we used a high intensity (similar to 10(20) W/cm(2)) x-ray pump x-ray probe scheme to observe changes in the ionic structure of silicon induced by x-ray heating of the electrons. By avoiding Laue spots in the scattering signal from a single crystalline sample, we observe a rapid rise in diffuse scattering and a transition to a disordered, liquidlike state with a structure significantly different from liquid silicon. The disordering occurs within 100 fs of irradiation, a timescale that agrees well with first principles simulations, and is faster than that predicted by purely inertial behavior, suggesting that both the phase change and disordered state reached are dominated by Coulomb forces. This method is capable of observing liquid scattering without masking signal from the ambient solid, allowing the liquid structure to be measured throughout and beyond the phase change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据