4.4 Article

Impact of germanium doping on the mechanical strength of low oxygen concentration Czochralski silicon wafers

期刊

PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE
卷 101, 期 5, 页码 517-532

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14786435.2020.1845913

关键词

Silicon; germanium; doping; dislocation mobility; dislocation locking; wafer strength; mechanical bending

资金

  1. Washington University in St. Louis
  2. Institute of Materials Science and Engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, it was found that germanium doping in silicon wafers with very low oxygen concentration does not have a significant effect on dislocation mobility. Germanium is unable to lock dislocations or change the behavior of oxygen-dislocation locking in silicon at high concentrations due to small lattice mismatch and low chemical interactions with silicon.
The lack of interstitial oxygen for locking and pinning of dislocations has made the ultra-high resistivity silicon wafers for radio frequency applications prone to slip and warpage during electronic device manufacturing. In this work, we investigate the role of germanium doping on the dislocation mobility in very low oxygen concentration, Czochralski-grown silicon wafers. Mechanical bending tests are used to study the average dislocation velocity and unlocking stress for germanium-doped, nitrogen-doped, and undoped silicon wafers with similar oxygen levels. In contrast to the previously reported effect of germanium on retarding dislocation motion in high oxygen concentration silicon wafers, we find that germanium by itself at a high concentration (7-9 x 10(19) atoms/cm(3)) does not lock dislocations by solid solution strengthening, nor does it appreciably change the oxygen dislocation locking behaviour in silicon. The lack of dislocation pinning and locking effects by germanium in silicon is explained from the small lattice mismatch (4%) and low chemical interactions of substitutional Ge atoms with silicon comparing to interstitial impurities, such as oxygen and nitrogen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据