4.4 Article

{10(1)over-bar2} twinning in single-crystal titanium under shock loading

期刊

PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE
卷 101, 期 7, 页码 836-850

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14786435.2021.1873449

关键词

Deformation twinning; single crystals; molecular dynamics simulations; titanium; shock

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using molecular dynamics simulations, this study investigates the evolution dynamics of twinning in single-crystal Ti under shock loading. The activation of twin variants in single-crystal Ti follows the Schmid criterion, but the activation time varies even with equal Schmid factors. The growth rate of twins is influenced by the number of activated twin variants, indicating that twin nucleation and growth depend on the loading conditions.
We employ molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the evolution dynamics of twinning in single-crystal Ti under shock loading. The shock compression applied perpendicular to the c-axis leads to the activation of twins in single-crystal Ti. We find the twin variant activation for each case of the applied loading conditions follows Schmid criterion. However, the time for the activation of twin variants is not the same even with equal Schmid factor. The evolution and dominance of twin variants in each case of the applied loading conditions do not depend on the Schmid factor. High nucleation events and low overall twin volume fraction occur for the case where two conjugate pairs of twin variants activate while low nucleation events and high overall twin volume fraction occur for the case where only one conjugate pair of twin variants activate. Twin nucleation takes place throughout the simulation time for each case of the applied loading conditions. High twin growth occurs for the case where only one conjugate pair of twin variants activate in comparison to the case where two conjugate pairs of twin variants activate. This indicates that the number of activated twin variants affects the growth rate of the twins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据