4.2 Article

Sample size calculations for single-arm survival studies using transformations of the Kaplan-Meier estimator

期刊

PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 499-511

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pst.2090

关键词

confidence intervals; Kaplan– Meier estimator; one sample test; sample size; survival analysis

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [16K16014]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K16014] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposed alternative methods to determine sample sizes based on a valid standard normal approximation, which may provide accurate results even with small sample sizes. Through numerical evaluations via simulations, some of the proposed methods were more accurate, with the method using the arcsine square-root transformation tending to be closer to a prescribed power.
In single-arm clinical trials with survival outcomes, the Kaplan-Meier estimator and its confidence interval are widely used to assess survival probability and median survival time. Since the asymptotic normality of the Kaplan-Meier estimator is a common result, the sample size calculation methods have not been studied in depth. An existing sample size calculation method is founded on the asymptotic normality of the Kaplan-Meier estimator using the log transformation. However, the small sample properties of the log transformed estimator are quite poor in small sample sizes (which are typical situations in single-arm trials), and the existing method uses an inappropriate standard normal approximation to calculate sample sizes. These issues can seriously influence the accuracy of results. In this paper, we propose alternative methods to determine sample sizes based on a valid standard normal approximation with several transformations that may give an accurate normal approximation even with small sample sizes. In numerical evaluations via simulations, some of the proposed methods provided more accurate results, and the empirical power of the proposed method with the arcsine square-root transformation tended to be closer to a prescribed power than the other transformations. These results were supported when methods were applied to data from three clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据